This should in fact never be a problem with this build; Sir John de Keith d

This should in fact never be a problem with this build; Sir John de Keith d

Re: ? Comyn spouse from Malise

In regards to the Comyn child who was partner out-of Malise out-of Strathearn, I’d theorized in 2005 one she was indeed Margaret, recognized as wife out of Sir John de- Keith (select backup of article below) who was 2ndly age are supplied where blog post: brand new spouse Emma I recommend was of another family members, and not mother of your 2nd Earl Malise.

Scots Peerage, sub _Comyn, Earl out-of Buchan_ , states in part, ‘Malise, Earl of Strathearn, got a wife Emma, when you look at the 1261-1267, whoever surname try unfamiliar ‘[SP II:256, alludes to Cal. from Docs., we. 2383, 2451]. a while just before 1270, making sure that his widow (Margaret) would-have-been “available” sometime just after Emma.

This is however a speculation; it will have the advantageous asset of handling a well-known relationships ranging from Muriel Keith and you can Reginald ce Cheyne. Any longer associated documents perform needless to say feel enjoy.

The newest account in Scots Peerage regarding the category of Keith says regarding Sir John de- Keith (d. ca. 1270) he try considered possess married Comyn, earl out of Buchan . This identification, of your unclear (“thought to were”) variety, are now able to be fixed according to the adopting the dispensation, old from the Fondi to the 14 The month of january 1378/9::

‘ Reg Aven 215, 50 To the bishop regarding Moray. Faculty to dispense Reginald Cheyn, donzel, and you may Murielle, damselle, d de- Keth, out of Moray and you may Aberdeen dioceses, regarding obstacle so you’re able to relationships arising from the next and you may next degrees of consanguinity. Fondi, 19 Kal. Feb., anno step 1. SRO Vat. Trans., iv, zero. 46. ‘

Muriel Keith, the near future next wife of Robert Stewart, initial Duke regarding Albany (d. 1420), try contracted so you can wed Reginald ce Cheyne, young buck of Sir Reginald le Cheyne by his partner (due to the fact their particular very first spouse), Helen of Strathearn. When you find yourself discover well-known holes throughout the origins from Muriel Keith, she and you can Reginald ce Cheyne perform express a lineage in the Comyns. Although not, this is as well faraway to need a good dispensation if Muriel was good-great-great grandd Comyn, Earl of Buchan (d. 1233), which will function as situation in the event the is why daughter.

2. Reginald ce Cheyne was an effective-grandson out of Marjory Comyn, child out of Alexander Comyn, Earl from Buchan (d. 1290), child regarding William Comyn listed above. Their young man try Malise, Earl off Strathearn out-of 1312 so you can his dying in 1328 , and father away from Reginald.

ca. 1270), are identical to Marjory Comyn, and you can partnered 2ndly in order to Malise, Earl away from Strathearn (d. 1312). This should indicate the brand new parentage a€?thought to keeps been’ that of Margaret, partner away from Sir John de- Keith, is actually out-of one to age bracket: she would not have started the fresh d Comyn, Earl from Buchan, PronalaЕѕenje supruge but alternatively of his young buck Alexander. There is no proof you to definitely Earl Malise and you will Marjory Comyn have been married far prior to 1275: as Lindsay wrote,

You will find one to discernable base on what the partnership between Reginald ce Cheyne and you may Muriel Keith might have stayed: in the event the Margaret Comyn, spouse off Sir John de- Keith (d

‘ New spouse of this earl, about 1275, try named Marjory, as we understand the attesting clause out-of Zero. cv., which can be said from the Wyntoun, Publication VIII. guy. vi., to have become next sister off John Comyn, Earl of Buchan, just who discussed on the part of Earl Malise the wedding settlement more than stated [dated at the London area, April twenty six, 1293 having his child Matilda and you can Robert de Tony, child out of Ralph].’

Alexander Comyn = E de Quincy Age away from Buchan I __________________I________________ I III step one) Sir John = Marjory = 2) Malise de- Keith We (als We E of Strathearn . 1270 We Margaret) I d. 1312 _____________I__ ___I__________________________ I We We I We I Sir William Bernard Malise Gilbert Robert Maud de Keith de- Keith Elizabeth regarding = Robert d. bef 1293 Strathearn; d. 1328 de Tony I ______I_______________________ I We We We Sir Edward Malise Mary Helen = Isabella de- Elizabeth off Strathearn = 1) Sir Reginald Synton d. ca. 1343 We le Cheyne We I We = 2) Sir David We V I I de- Graham Sir William de We We__________ Keith We We = Margaret Fraser __________________I_______ V __I_____________ We We I III I We I I Muriel + Reginald Mary Mariota Keith ce Cheyne (= Robert Stewart, Duke out-of Albany)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *